New Delhi, 1994.
Photo: R Barraez D´Lucca / Flickr
New Delhi, 1994. Photo: R Barraez D´Lucca / Flickr

Trans*forming the Constitution

India’s Transgender Persons Bill might undo several years of progressive judicial precedent.

Ajita Banerjie is a researcher on gender and sexuality rights in India. She can be reached at banerjie.ajita@gmail.com.

Published on

In 1884, a transgender person in Morarabad district of northern India was arrested by police after the person was found crossdressing and singing with a group of women. Given the name 'Khairati' in the case files, the person became one of the first to be prosecuted under the infamous Section 377 of the colonial-era Indian Penal Code (IPC), which criminalised "carnal intercourse against the order of nature" – an umbrella term for non-procreative sexual acts. Queen Empress v Khairati was initiated by the police without a complainant. They appeared to have been monitoring the person who was suspected of being a eunuch, leading the presiding judge to commend "the desire of the authorities at Moradabad to check these disgusting practices."

Intolerance of the state and society towards India's transgender people continues to this day, as does that law. The nature of discrimination ranges from impediments in accessing education, employment and healthcare, to extortion, harassment, arbitrary arrests and sexual violence. The ostracism forces many to drop out of schools and universities, and pushes some to seek a livelihood through begging or sex work, making them likely to fall foul of the law. While the concerted efforts of activists led to a progressive judgement in 2014, the legislation currently being considered by the country's Parliament threatens to roll back some of the gains.

Loading content, please wait...
Himal Southasian
www.himalmag.com