The history of geography

Published on

The Sino-Indian border dispute has a lot to do with Tibet's past.

It is common knowledge that one of the most contentious issues that has bedevilled the bilateral relationship between India and China is the matter of their common boundary. What is not generally known is that the dispute is complicated by the fact that, prior to 1950, Tibet was a ´suzerain´ entity with the power to enter into treaties on its own. In short, the Sino-Indian boundary dispute is embedded in the disputed status of Tibet. What follows is a table that encapsulates various dimensions of the dispute vis-a-vis the Himalayan rimland.

Clues used by early colonial officials to roughly indicate Indo-Tibetan borders included an enthnocultural criterion of whether an area was under "Tibetan influence" or not. This, in practice, meant the presence of Tibetan-speaking villages showing some sort of loyalty to Lhasa and/or the presence of a gompa (monastery) in the said locality connected with one of the major monasteries in Tibet, or simply mountain ranges and passes with Tibetan names. This procedure was followed particularly in the extreme Eastern sector where there were various tribes such as Tawangs, Charduars, Thengla Bhutias, Akas, Daflas, Miris, Abors and Mishmis.

Loading content, please wait...
Himal Southasian
www.himalmag.com