Over the top

Over the top

Raising a regional ruckus

  • Frontpage
  • About us
  • Bloggers
    • Finny Forever
    • Jhuma Sen
    • Chalphal
    • Vijay Vikram
    • Joseph Allchin
    • Isa Daudpota
    • Nepali Dada
    • Shoonya
    • Kanak Mani Dixit
    • Sub Rosa
    • Iqbal Khattak
    • Laxmi Murthy
    • Surabhi
    • Smriti
    • Carey L Biron
  • Contact Us

Asses declare independence – II

Posted in Civic rights, Oddities, Politics, Uncategorized by Shoonya
Dec 21 2009

After I covered the declaration of Momoland and Tuppiwan last week, I got an email from one particular ‘entity‘ inside present-day Nepal who called himself (or herself) Robot. He claimed to be the spokesperson of a separatist movement “Buttoms Liberation.” He informed me that they were making preparations to declare an independent nation of “Andoland.” After some exchanges, I was interested enough to ask him for an online-interview. I am publishing the interview in two parts. This post is part two of the series. (Click here for part one).

Excerpts:

This is getting very uncomfortable and illogical.
asshole5

No wonder. We are so a*holes that even when I am giving this interview, I fear of revealing my true identity. While we are declaring a new country, we fear of laying claim on any territories, while we are declaring independence, we fear of coming out in the open and make a public announcement. In fact, our community is inherently the most inclusive, democratic of all communities. Lips envy each other at their pout-ability and kiss-ability. Eyes, brains, hands, muscles, noses, breasts, genitals, buttocks, legs- all of them compare, fight, conspire against, and envy each other. All of them are un-inclusive, unequal, and disproportionate by their very natures. We a*holes are a very inclusive, progressive and democratic society. All of us are similar in shape, size, color, kind and function. There’s no comparison, envy, none among us is more beautiful, privileged or stronger than the others. We are very humble, dutiful and industrious beings. I don’t think you have to feel uncomfortable because of us.

So, is this a country for some pieces of flesh, and not actual people?

Let me be clear here. We aren’t a group of certain professionals, ethnicities, language, caste, sex or so on. We are very diverse, of all groups and walks in life. But we don’t care about what gum you are going to chew for the bus-ride or what dress you are going to wear for that bath. Of course we have our opinions and perspectives too, but we think it is for the better prepared and specialized ones to deal with that. We deal with our work, things we are better prepared and specialized for. We want to be able to do what we are good at, and without any sorts of disturbance in the name of all your nation-building. You can chew your gum, but let me walk to my office for work. You can choose your dress for bath, but give me a place to go when I am chased by thugs.

Unfortunately, this was asking for too much. So, we chose to take the tough way.

What is the name of your country?

We have proposed the name Andoland. But it will be decided after the first election takes place. Same with the flag.

What territories?

We are in a publicity (प्रचारात्मक) campaign right now. We haven’t laid claims on any territory. And we don’t think we will be successful in getting the international recognition for our borders right now. So, we have decided to run our government on exile and on the internet. We will keep fighting for a physical territory for ourselves, but in the meantime, we aren’t going to stop for the lack of it. There are many new countries in the world whose borders are not recognized by the international community.

A government on the Internet? That sounds ridiculous !

As I told you, we are the most democratic and inclusive lot. Currently, we don’t have a government, just a few founding fathers and a “binders” body. The basic principles laid down by them for the founding of the country will be our guidelines. People agreeing with these principles are welcome to be the citizens of our glorious nation. A constitution will be written based on these principles, and an election for the government will be held later. The government will have very powers just enough for monitoring and regulating the system. All the citizens will be the members of our parliament on the internet. Discussions on legislation, voting, legal disputes, all will be done on the internet. This will make our governance very participatory and inclusive. There will be regular referendums on all major issues, and the government will only have the powers to enact the motions approved by the parliament. The principles laid down by the founding fathers include free internet access to all, equal influence of all citizens in governance and guarantee of all natural rights to all citizens. For more details, you’ll have to wait before we release a draft of our first constitution in our parliament for review.
asshole1
Are you serious? This all sounds very dreamy.

Yes, it does. But we are very serious. As I told you, these values like inclusion, solidarity, freedom and democracy are our inherent values, we don’t need to try to adapt to them. In fact, in the long future, we hope that a*holes from all over the world, declare independence from their own countries and work towards forming a global federation of a*holes’ countries. As the first independent a*holes, we will use our influence and strength to support the rebellion of a*holes in other parts of the world. Call it an a*hole empire if you like but who knows, in the future that you and I won’t live to see, these a*holes may succeed in establishing a global unified state (or non-state) that will be an ideal of democracy, freedom, solidarity and prosperity. I have a firm belief that if all the a*holes all around the world unite for this dream, then we will soon achieve this new height of civilization. We have nothing to loose.

Mr. Robot, It was very nice talking to you. I look forward to talking to you in the future about this interesting phenomenon. If my readers happen to be interested in your ideas, I will come again for an interview. Before ending, could you please tell my readers how one gets to be a citizen of your country?
asshole4
The pleasure is all mine Shoonya. Thanks for giving us this opportunity. Well, everybody who agrees with, and commits himself to the founding principles of our country can be a citizen.

We welcome all like-thinking people to revolt from their countries, and join our glorious country.


Readers with questions for Robot: please send it as comment below, or send me a mail at shoonya3 at gmail.com and I’ll forward them to him/her.


Picture Sources: top , middle , bottom.

No Comments yet »
Tagged as: analysis, ass, democracy, federalism, internet, nepal, separatist

Asses declare independence – I

Posted in Civic rights, Oddities, Politics, Uncategorized by Shoonya
Dec 21 2009

After I covered the declaration of Momoland and Tuppiwan last week, I got an email from one particular ‘entity’ inside present-day Nepal who called himself (or herself) Robot. He claimed to be the spokesperson of a separatist movement “Buttoms Liberation.” He informed me that they were making preparations to declare an independent nation of “Andoland.” After some exchanges, I was interested enough to ask him for an online-interview. I am publishing the interview in two parts. This post is part one of the series. (Click here for part two).

asshole2

Excerpts:

Shoonya: So, you are declaring an independent country in itself?

Robot: Yes. We have decided that that is the only way we can secure a place where our rights are safeguarded and concerns are heard. We are no more interested in the present day country of Nepal. That is because we don’t have the slightest of faith in our interests being addressed by this completely failed system of mess. We have been wronged, humiliated, kept systematically out of the mainstream and given deferential treatment for too long. We have decided that we have had enough.

Doesn’t that amount to the violation of the interim constitution of Nepal?

It doesn’t apply to us. First of all, we no longer care about the constitution of Nepal. Even if we were too, observing from the ongoing developments, this wouldn’t amount to the violation of the constitution. The interim constitution of your country mentions about Nepal being a federal state, with several provinces/states. Look around you, people are declaring ‘autonomous republics,’ which is not what was visioned in the interim constitution. If states or provinces can be intrepreted to be equivalent to ‘autonomous republics,’ we may as well extend that definition to encompass ‘independent countries.’ We are glad that you picked on this in your writing, but look at the press and opinion in Nepal- all the criticisms are against ignoring the mandate of the Constituent Assembly, and not about violating the very spirit of the constitution. They are very sensitive about each word in other legal documents, but choose to ignore a very distasteful misinterpretation of the words and spirit of the supreme law.

Couldn’t you have taken your concerns for hearing within the existing system? The constituent assembly is writing a constitution – you could have lobbied for your concerns. There are many rights-organizations, political bodies, civil societies that could have supported your demands for greater inclusion and rights. It looks like you are more interested in spreading instability than getting your demands addressed.

Your question implies that the civil societies and other actors are unaware of our plight which is a very misleading and dangerous implication. But this is not unexpected. In fact, this is the most-asked question to us. I’d like to repeat that we have lost all our interest and faith in your system. We think it is easier for us to run a country of our own than asking for redressal in Nepal.

Why do you think so ?

Most thinkers – though we don’t think they are capable of thinking – in the system are too engrossed in the grand debates of proportionate inclusion, federalism, whether to call it a insurgency or a people’s war, whether to dry the linen in a nylon rope or a PVC-cord, whether to wear a black cap with white tunic or a grey cap with a pink underwear, deciding from the measurement of a person’s stomach’s stiffness whether he had a bottle of whiskey or a sip of coke, whether somebody is progressive or regressive, never-ending meetings with one foreigner or the other, with one leader or the other, demonstration and strikes, whether this and that bull shit, all yack, yack, yack.

We can’t participate in such debates, it’s out of the question and our limited ability. It’s like asking an atheist to choose the most proper religious text to be read out in a religious ceremony. Despite not being good at this all, we have written many times to the public personalities in Nepal asking them to give some thought on our conditions and address our issues. We don’t know if they didn’t understand us, or were uninterested or thought that ignoring the voices of non-entities like us would not matter much. After all, there are many important subjects like the ones mentioned above for the whole opinion-makers and influencers of Nepal to concentrate on. A slight deviation or lack of concentration would mean disaster for Nepal.

You have been repeatedly talking of the plight of this community you claim to represent. Who are you all actually?

We are a*holes.

Excuse me ?

Yes, you heard it right.

An ass-hole

An ass-hole

Could you please elaborate? Are you some kind of punk band, hippie-kids or members of the more later cult of hip-hop? Please remember that you are on-record for a prestigious blog in the region.

Some of us might be, in fact, some of us might even be like one of you – though it clearly seems you are not – we are a diverse group of people, of all races, cultures, sex, origin, profession and personal values. But there’s a very strong and common binding factor in all of us – we all are a*holes.

And how’s that? How are you all what you say you are?

See, we are the most neglected and depressed – everybody sits on on, shits on us – part of the body, underbelly is a lot more privileged than us. We are out of sight of the eyes and out of consideration of the head. Our voice is the most despised of all sounds. We don’t claim to be the most useful, powerful or brilliant of all body-parts, but we definitely are very necessary and important. But other parts of the body have never given it a thought. They are still thinking that this can continue. And they are to be blamed for all this – the heads, eyes, hands, lips, legs, bellies, even our own neighbors- the buttocks.


Readers with questions for Robot: please send it as comment below, or send me a mail at shoonya3 at gmail.com and I’ll forward them to him/her.


Picture Sources: top , bottom .


No Comments yet »
Tagged as: analysis, ass, democracy, federalism, internet, nepal, separatist

Of Double Standard and Animal Sacrifices – II

Posted in Publishing, Religion, Uncategorized by Shoonya
Dec 07 2009
TrackBack Address.

This is a follow-up to my earlier post. I wanted to see what kind of news about Nepal were covered, mainly by the BBC. I have gathered some quick Google results (Google web search and Google news search) for a set of different search queries about Nepal. The queries were made on the 4th Dec 2009, 11:49 (Nepal time). Though this is not an exhaustive research, and the results don’t produce anything even close to ‘conclusive,’ I hope it can give some hints, and justify my reasons in the earlier post.

Numbers to the right of the colon (”:”) are the total number of pages returned for the search query given at the left of the colon. Sources (either BBC or all) are written inside braces.

'nepal'+'gadhimai' returned 931 pages from bbc.co.uk on google web search
‘nepal’+'gadhimai’ returned 931 pages from bbc.co.uk on google web search

"nepal"+"karnali" returned 25 pages from bbc.co.uk on google web search
“nepal”+”karnali” returned 25 pages from bbc.co.uk on google web search

Google Web:

  • “nepal”+”christian”+”conversion” : 42 (bbc.co.uk) picture
  • “nepal”+”christian”+”death” : 286 (bbc.co.uk) picture
  • “nepal”+”road accident” : 50 (bbc.co.uk) 50 picture
  • “nepal”+”karnali” : 25 (bbc.co.uk) picture
  • “nepal”+”karnali”+”food” : 4 (bbc.co.uk) picture
  • “nepal”+”gadhimai” : 931 (bbc.co.uk) picture
  • “nepal” : 31,300 (bbc.co.uk) picture

”nepal”+”christian”+”death” returned 1740 results on google news search
”nepal”+”christian”+”death” returned 1740 results on google news search

"nepal"+"christian"+"convert" returned 194 results on google news search
“nepal”+”christian”+”convert” returned 194 results on google news search

Google News:

  • “nepal”+”karnali” : 1040 (all) picture
  • “nepal”+”hinduism” : 1700 (all) picture
  • “nepal”+”christian”+”death” : 1740 (all) picture
  • “nepal”+”christian”+”convert” : 194 (all) picture
  • “nepal”+”karnali” : 135 (BBC) picture
  • “nepal”+”hinduism” : 29 (BBC) picture
  • “nepal”+”christian”+”death” : 7 (BBC) picture
  • “nepal”+”christian”+”convert” : 2 (BBC) picture
  • “nepal”+”christian” : 72 (BBC) picture
  • “nepal”+”tibet” : 508 (BBC) picture

I leave it for you to decide what is the defining characteristic of Christianity in Nepal: death or conversion? The figures speak for themselves on what kind of coverage did Gadhimai receive and what really are the pressing issues of Nepal.

Thanks for your comments :)


Searches executed on Google Web Search and Google News Archive Search


No Comments yet »
Tagged as: analysis, animals, BBC, gadhimai, google, hinduism, hypocrisy, karnali, media, nepal, Religion, sacrifice

Archives

Recent Posts

  • Being gay in Bangladesh
  • Trafficked to India
  • Nepal in the dark
  • When the epochal fire lit
  • Cafe Bol hosts a discussion on political prisoners in Pakistan

People said…

  • S. P. Dharne on But at what cost, Mr Minister?
  • Gurdev on Sathya Sai (& the Royal Wedding)
  • ikie on Sathya Sai (& the Royal Wedding)
  • mahesh19682002 on Sathya Sai (& the Royal Wedding)
  • goldenage on Sathya Sai (& the Royal Wedding)

What do we talk about the most?

America analysis animals arundhati roy ass Ayodhya Babri Masjid Bangladesh bicycles Burma cars China Communalism Cricket democracy federalism gadhimai google hinduism horns hypocrisy India internet Karen KNU land mines Liberhan Commission Report media Mumbai Nandita Haksar nepal Obama Operation Leech Pakistan Peshawar Peshawar Press Club Ram Janmabhoomi Religion review sacrifice Science fiction separatist Southasia Suicide Bombing war

Our Partners

  • Film South Asia
  • Himal Southasian
  • Hri Institute for Southasian Research and Exchange
Powered by WordPress | “Blend” from Spectacu.la WP Themes Club